…I’d be president.
Hillary Blames White Women For Loss
What’s the Diplomatic Protocol for a attending a Tea Party Reception with Vlad Putin? Miss Manners says that “If you can’t find an excuse to be in another country, just pretend to sip.”
Democratic Representative Eric Swalwell appears to be fixated on the “studs” in the Trump Administration. I couldn’t quite figure out whether he was making a veiled reference to Stormy Daniels, or refurbishing the Oval Office for Trump’s second term. Now rumor does have it that Mr. Swalwell has spent some serious time personally investigating the Trump/Stormy connection. He brags that he’s logged at least 40 hours on Ms. Daniels rather ‘ample’ website.
Somebody had both the facts (IG and DOJ) and cajones to not let McCabe pull a #LoisLerner . You, Mr. Swalwell, should be less worried about the 'studs' in the Trump organization and more worried about Barack Obama's pension. After all, a fish rots from the head.
— ThePublicEditor.com (@TPE_PubEditor) March 17, 2018
**Disclaimer–Just kidding, Mr. Swalwell. We won’t know for sure that you’ve been using your Government computer to log onto porn sites until we finish the investigation. Oh, and as far as using your Congressional Expense Account to pay for your PornHub subscription….? I’m sure you have a perfectly logical explanation.
**FakeNewsAlert**
“Climate activists predict both outcomes — more snow, less snow — so they are never wrong,” from “The Politically Incorrect Guide to Climate Change (The Politically Incorrect Guides)“.
“Predictions of less snow were ubiquitous by global warming scientists. But once that prediction failed to come true, the opposite of what they predicted instead
became—what they expected. How did global warming scientists explain record snow after prediction less snow? Easy. More snow is now caused by global warming. ‘Snow is consistent with global warming, say scientists’ blared a UK Telegraph headline in 2009. The Financial Times tried to explain “Why global warming means…more snow” in 2012…
So no matter what happens, the activists can claim with confidence the event was a predicted consequence of global warming. There is now no way to ever falsify global warming claims.”